Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Cutting weight, living on less, etc.

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Cutting weight, living on less, etc.

    Many of us are currently or could benefit from the loss of a few extra lbs.

    This was brought home to me recently at a training class with a certain instructor who is known for the conditioning aspects of his seminars. A year ago with him doing similar conditioning I was sucking hind teat as the saying goes. This time around the results were almost a full 180. I attribute a lot of that to the fact that I'm almost 30 lbs. lighter now.

    Also I've been cutting weight this month in preparation for an upcoming competition.

    Now before anyone posts the "you can't do that for long, you'll die" type stuff understand that I have no health problems (praise the Lord) that would preclude this type of activity. I have no heart issues, I don't have diabetes, etc. I've done this sort of thing before, it's just been a long time since I did.



    So I've dropped pretty close to 10 lbs. this calendar month. Was 215 the start of the month and this morning it was 207.6 and most likely will be at 205 by Monday.

    I wanted to basically have a little experiment in "living on less" for a month or more to see what effects it had on my energy levels, my body in general, etc.

    I have made no changes to daily routines, workout schedules, etc. I'm not sitting under a tree all day long doing nothing but taking in 1,000 calories.

    Three days a week we do martial arts for 2 1/2 hours including 30 minutes or more of sparring. Three days a week we run a mile after doing a workout. There is always some physical work around the homestead intermixed between this and normal life activities.

    I've been subsisting on 1,000 to 1,500 calories a day during this month. I've seen this amount of calories called a "starvation diet." I've seen people say you couldn't do "any" physical labor off of this amount.

    Now, this MIGHT be true for some Barney Fife skinny dude with no reserves. However from meeting thousands of survivalists over the years, I can tell you that their ain't many folks like that in the movement ;)

    Yes, right now, I'm burning reserves, but hey that was the plan after all :)

    I'm not arguing or trying to prove that you could live just fine off of 1,000 calories with a lot of physical activity for years, please understand that. Could it be done for a few months? I would guess yes if the person is starting with some "reserves" to burn through. OR if the physical activity is lessened.

    I'm not sure the latter is an option in a SHTF situation. Unless your talking about spending a couple weeks or a month in a shelter avoiding fallout.

    Your body does get used to living on less and you do crave food less. Energy levels haven't been ever to the point where I "couldn't" workout or spar, but I have had an energy drink on sparing days once or twice ;) Nothing that coffee wouldn't do, but I can't stand coffee without a lot of cream and sugar which = empty calories.

    Obviously no one show start any diet without consulting their physician, blah blah blah liability statement.... However I think it's important for each of us to know what our body can and can't do under limited caloric intake. If your looking to drop some lbs. it's a perfect time to figure that out also.

    We can KNOW, or we can THINK we know. If possible, we ought to all know for sure ahead of time. While you might have mountains of food storage, understand that you can lose ANYTHING that's tangible.

    Lowdown3
    www.homesteadingandsurvival.com

    www.survivalreportpodcast.com

    "Don't be too proud of this technological terror you've constructed..."

  • #2
    the 1k to 1500 cal a day mark was how i lost what i did year or so back.

    losing the lbs makes a major difference in everything...as does just being in shape and not just losing the wieght...
    good post LD.
    Hey Petunia...you dropped your man pad!

    Comment


    • #3
      If the economy get any worse and grocery prices keep going up we will all be living on less calories.

      Comment


      • #4
        Arrrgghhhhh! I did not read this post... I am not here... Back to my dinner and too lazy of a lifestyle...

        But I know I need to get serious once again about this, as it does get HARDER with age. The weight I lost at 33 was EASY compared to what I have to do at 44... Bah Humbug!

        Rmpl
        -=> Rmplstlskn <=-

        Comment


        • #5
          Thanks for sharing the results. yep, we all need it. It would do us all good. Every body system benefits.

          Comment


          • #6
            I know what you mean about age Rmpl, last time I did this I was about 19, almost 20 years ago.

            FWIW folks, I was more wanting to comment on the "we can live on less caloric intake" more than the "toot my horn I lost some weight" deal. I always read these "you HAVE to have 3,000 calories a day just to live" type posts wherein someone says you could never live off rice and beans, blah blah blah and I just smile, knowing that my son has been raised on that for 10 years and is healthy, lean and strong as a horse.
            www.homesteadingandsurvival.com

            www.survivalreportpodcast.com

            "Don't be too proud of this technological terror you've constructed..."

            Comment


            • #7
              204.6 this a.m.

              Caloric intake has been in the 1,000 to 1,500 range. Training days (most) I've had a zero or 20 calorie energy drink. Haven't had coffee in about a month now. I'm gonna shoot for 195 which I haven't seen since around age 20.... I'm sure their will be some more I could lose from there, but I'll cross that bridge when I get there.

              Energy levels are the same. Food "cravings" are pretty much gone. Although when you go up till 4:30pm with less than 300 calories, you really do look forward to something for dinner, especially after running and a workout.
              www.homesteadingandsurvival.com

              www.survivalreportpodcast.com

              "Don't be too proud of this technological terror you've constructed..."

              Comment


              • #8
                Great work! You motivate the rest of us to do it...
                -=> Rmplstlskn <=-

                Comment


                • #9
                  I got the news from my Dr.: Either lose some weight or become a full-blown diabetic. I looked around and chose the South Beach diet. Basically, it's a low-carb diet that emphasized that you do NOT let yourself get hungry. When you're hungry, you tend to make bad food choices. Anyway, on that I lost 55 pounds. I went from 265 to 210 in a little over two months. That did NOT get me into shape, it just made it possible to consider the possibility. The goal here is to get into some kind of decent physical condition WITHOUT the major coronary in the process.... They probably have the South Beach book at your local library. The first two chapters describe the diet, the rest of the book is recipes that you probably won't use. Again, it's super simple, and it worked for me.

                  It works by making your food work for you, instead of going straight to fat. With it, it's not about how much you eat, it's about what you eat. You can get as many calories as it takes to keep you satisfied, it's just that those calories work for you. One of the things that you cut out is sugar. I did that for the two months, and you would not believe the result. After those two months, I ate something with a little sugar in it, and it tasted just flat NASTY! Makes you think, don't it?
                  Last edited by Bearman202; 10-30-2010, 07:04 AM.

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    It does make a big difference on what type of calories they are also. If the calories come from all sugar, then it not good. Eatting the right kind of diet makes a big difference.

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Yep, good points all.
                      Boris- "He's famous, has picture on three dollar bill!"

                      Rocky- "Wow! I've never even seen a three dollar bill!"

                      Boris- "Is it my fault you're poor?"

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Broke the 2 bills mark yesterday and 198 today. I was telling another forum member, I think the last time I was sub 200 I was about 20 years old!
                        www.homesteadingandsurvival.com

                        www.survivalreportpodcast.com

                        "Don't be too proud of this technological terror you've constructed..."

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Congratulations! I admire your willpower.

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            WOW wtg lowdown3

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              Originally posted by Lowdown3 View Post
                              Broke the 2 bills mark yesterday and 198 today. I was telling another forum member, I think the last time I was sub 200 I was about 20 years old!
                              Well done!

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X