Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

RE: The ABCs of Trauma, by Dr. Mountaintop

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • RE: The ABCs of Trauma, by Dr. Mountaintop

    Hi All,

    There was a very good article on Survivalblog over the weekend called: The ABCs of Trauma, by Dr. Mountaintop. I wanted to respond to it with a "letter re:" but much as I love Survivalblog my submission did not get through the gatekeeper. In order to share it, I'll post it here. I hope it is of some use:

    Letter Re: The ABCs of Trauma, by Dr. Moutaintop (Survivalblog)

    I am responding Re: The ABCs of Trauma, by Dr. Moutaintop. This was an excellent article written by a Doctor. I wanted to add to it from a different perspective, that of an Army Combat Medic. Now, granted not all situations post-SHTF will be combat, but this applies to a lot of trauma cases caused by other mechanisms of injury. I am a current and qualified US Army Combat medic, and as such I am also required to be an EMT. This is relatively low on the food chain of medical expertise and in no way equates to the qualifications of Dr. Moutaintop, but there is something to be said for a perspective from this level, which will encompass what the Army terms as CLS (Combat Lifesavers) and is at a level where preppers may be able to operate prior to seeking more definitive medical treatment. I do not seek to challenge the Doctors’s article, simply add to elements where Combat Medic protocols have utility.

    The Doctor concentrates on A-B-C’s, whereas the combat protocol is H-A-B-C, which puts hemorrhage before Airway, if it is indicated, but still includes circulation for less serious bleeds and IVs. The other big difference is tourniquets: tourniquets used to be considered a tool of last resort. Now they are considered a tool of first resort in a combat environment. The following article does not presume to attempt to give all the answers, but it is a basic summary.

    Some procedures that are appropriate in a civilian ambulance situation are not appropriate on the battlefield. Ambulance crews may give fluids to casualties on the way to the hospital, where blood is available. They can, in simple terms, keep putting the fluids in and get definitive care once they arrive at the emergency room. In a battlefield situation, fluids are not given except in specific circumstances. In simple terms, when you go into true shock by losing circulating body fluids (i.e. blood) your blood pressure will drop. As your body responds to the injury and the loss of blood, it will draw blood into the vital organs at the core of the body, at the expense of the limbs. Thus, as blood pressure falls you begin to lose the distal pulses (i.e. in the wrist and foot), then closer and closer to the core until you have no pulses but the heart, and the heart will be the last to give out at the lowest blood pressure. In a combat situation, if you give too much fluid, there is a danger of “blowing the clot” and effectively bleeding out while diluting the blood left in the body, reducing its ability to carry oxygen. Also, fluids frequently given such as Lactated Ringers are rapidly absorbed into tissue so over time they are not really effectively increasing the volume of the blood. Hence the giving of fluids in the ambulance, where in very simple terms you can keep putting it in until you reach the emergency room and blood/plasma products are available. The fluid given for a traumatic wounding on the battlefield is not lactated ringers or similar, but Hextend, which is a starch product. Over roughly an hour, 500cc of Hextend will draw fluids out of surrounding tissue and bulk up to around 800cc. Guidelines state that you can use a maximum of two 500cc bags, 30 minutes apart. The protocol is only to give fluids if there are no radial (or pedal) pulses, which are the pulses in the wrist or foot. The reason is that you want to bring the blood pressure up enough to restore distal circulation to the extremities but no more, because you don’t want to blow any clots or cause the casualty to bleed out. For other injuries such as dehydration other fluids are still given, but not for trauma.

    The fact is that a large number of combat injuries are not survivable. Sometimes this will be obvious and the casualty has no chance of survival. Other times, survival will depend on appropriate interventions followed by rapid evacuation and definitive surgical care. There is a difference between being able to keep someone alive at the point of wounding and continuing to keep them alive due to the presence or absence of available definitive care. Do what you can to initially prevent death and get them to someone who can help, or worst case read some books on battlefield surgery and do something yourself, even if it’s just cleaning, debriding and suturing wounds and providing antibiotics, hoping that internal injuries and bleeding are not too severe and will heal in time.

    The use of body armor will reduce the incidence of penetrating trauma sustained in combat to the torso and the damage and resulting internal bleeding. Historically, 90% of combat deaths occur before the casualty reaches the treatment facility. The three major, potentially survivable causes of death on the battlefield are: extremity hemorrhage exsanguination (severe bleeding), tension pneumothorax (oxygen shortage and low blood pressure due to a collapsed lung, a condition that may progress to cardiac arrest if untreated) and airway obstruction. Historically, the most frequent and preventable of these causes of death is extremity bleeding. Most wounds to the extremities will cause death by bleeding out, and this is preventable. Some combat wounds are simply not survivable and will not respond to medical attention i.e. severe internal bleeding or visible brain matter etc.

    Care Under Fire:

    In this phase the casualty is “on the X” at the point of wounding. This is the point of greatest danger for the CLS. An assessment should be made for signs of life (i.e. is the casualty obviously dead). Cover fire should be given and fire superiority achieved. The casualty should be told, if conscious, to either return fire, apply self-aid, crawl to cover or lay still (don’t tell them to “play dead!”). Once it becomes possible to reach the casualty, the only treatment given in the care under fire phase, if required, is a hasty tourniquet “high and tight” on a limb, over the clothing, in order to prevent extremity bleeding. The casualty should be rapidly moved to cover (drag them).

    Tourniquet application: “high and tight” means right up at the top of the leg or arm, right in the groin (inguinal) or armpit (axial) region. The tourniquet needs to be cinched down tight to stop the bleeding. Use/purchase the CAT – Combat Application Tourniquet.

    When applying tourniquets, they need to be tight enough to stop the distal pulse i.e. the pulse in the foot or wrist, if the limb has not been traumatically amputated. You will not be able to check this pulse at this phase, so just get the tourniquet on tight and check the distal pulse as part of the next phase, tactical field care.

    Traumatic amputation: get the tourniquet on high and tight and tighten it until the bleeding stops. Note: in some circumstances there will be pulsating arterial bleeding and severe venous bleeding, but other times it is possible that there may be less bleeding initially as the body reacts in shock and “shuts down” the extremities, but bleeding will resume when the body relaxes. So get that tourniquet on tight.
    Compartment Syndrome: you don’t want to be feeling sorry for the casualty and trying to cinch the tourniquet down “only just enough”. Tighten it to stop the distal pulse. If you don’t, the continuing small amount of blood circulation into the limb can cause compartment syndrome, which is a build-up of toxins: when the tourniquet is removed, these toxins flood into the body and can seriously harm the casualty.
    For an improvised tourniquet, make sure the strap is no less than 2 inches wide, to prevent it cutting into the flesh of the limb.

    Tactical Field Care:

    Once the casualty is no longer “on the X”, CLS can move into the Tactical Field Care phase. This is where the CLS conducts the assessment of the casualty and treats the wounds as best as possible according to H-A-B-C:

    Hemorrhage: During the Tactical Field care phase, any serious extremity bleeding (arterial or serious venous) on a limb, including traumatic amputation, is treated with a tourniquet 2-3 inches above the wound. Axial (armpit), inguinal (groin) and neck wounds are treated by packing with Kerlix or combat gauze (treated with hemostatic agent, commercially available from Quickclot) and wrapping up with ACE type bandage. Once you have dragged the casualty to cover, you will conduct a blood sweep of the neck, axial region, arms, inguinal region and legs. This can be done as a pat down, a “feel” or “claw”, or simply ripping your hands down the limbs. Debate exists as to the best method. Conduct the blood sweep and look at your hands at each stage to see if you have found blood. Once a wound is found, check for exit wounds. Ignore minor bleeds at this stage: you are concerned about pulsating arterial bleeds and any kind of serious bleed where you can see the blood rapidly running out of the body.

    Beware of deliberate tourniquet application to the lower limbs, below the knee and elbows. The two small bones there may cause problems, particularly with traumatic amputation, and the tourniquet may either not be effective or cause further harm to the casualty. Assess it. Also, if the injury is, for example, below the knee, then don’t put the tourniquet over a joint, put it above the joint.

    Airway: CLS can aid the airway by positioning (i.e. head tilt/chin lift to open the airway) and use of the NPA. An NPA should be used for any casualty who is unconscious or who otherwise has an altered mental status.

    Last edited by max velocity; 07-30-2012, 11:10 AM.
    Max Velocity

    Max Velocity Tactical presents Contact! A Tactical Manual for Post Collapse Survival

    Are you Ready?

  • #2
    Well written.

    I've noticed a big divide over the years in civilian medicine versus military medicine.
    20 or so years ago, spent a period of time in the desert and the SF docs taught us one way..... get back home later and some of the civilian trained- and even standard military unit guys with 91Alpha type designations, called BS on what the SF docs taught.

    Wasn't that long after that "the protocols changed" and lo and behold, what the SF docs taught us was now considered the "correct" way. I was happy to see things come "full circle."

    A relative that recently became a paramedic reported that he "knew to keep quiet" about what he learned/practiced regarding tourniquet use- cause he figured the civilian EMS guys would crap themselves. Evidently the rationalization for tourniquets even in that realm has started to break through.

    My question has always been from a SURVIVAL MEDICINE standpoint- Ok so Jim gets clipped out on patrol, we do the "high and tight" ;) tourniquet, evac as allowed under tactical situation. Everything is going well, we get back to the hide/retreat/base camp. Now what? Do you:

    1. Try to deal with the surgical aspects BEFORE opening the tourniquet? Realize time on the body is an issue, also time to do whatever procedure is needed.
    2. Release the tourniquet and attempt a direct pressure/pressure dressing fix? Realize situational dependent for the specific wound.

    My concern has always been the "stick the finger in the garden hose" issue- build up of pressure. So you get a pressure dressing applied, everything is quiet, then the tourniquet is released and the clot is blown?
    A little release a little at a time? Depends also on arterial or vein I would assume?

    I've told people for years that body armor is CHEAP insurance. How much is your LIFE WORTH?
    Boris- "He's famous, has picture on three dollar bill!"

    Rocky- "Wow! I've never even seen a three dollar bill!"

    Boris- "Is it my fault you're poor?"

    Comment


    • #3
      1Admin,
      That's some interesting stuff. To respond: that question really gets out of the realm of what I can comment on based on my training, and gets into a more practical needs/common sense situation where better trained medical input would be useful to this thread. As you note, the whole battlefield and civilian medicine thing requires evacuation to a medical facility where more definitive treatment is given, so we try to keep the casualty alive until then. But what if there is no definitve care in an SHTF situation?
      I believe that if you cannot get the help of a surgeon or medical professional, you will have to do something yourself. The body armor point is good, if you can avoid penetrating wounds to the torso you have increased your chances a lot.
      Interestingly, as part of getting to where we are today with tourniquet use, the British Army used to teach battlefield tourniquet use where you would release it slowly every 15 minutes, in order to not blow the clot but allow blood into the limb. Releasing the tourniquet is no longer the protocol. But hasty "high and tight" tourniquets should always be converted to deliberate tourniquets a couple inches above the wound(s) on the skin, when possible. Also, tourniquets should be converted to pressure dressings when possible. Use of hemostatic agents such as quickclot/combat guaze and packing of the wound before dressing it can help with this. But agreed, if it is for instance a femoral bleed, then you are going to have to tie off or repair the femoral - thats above my pay grade! - before you can do anything useful about taking the tournquet off.
      Ultimately, if faced with this situation, and better trained medcial care was not available, I would do my best to do a surgical fix, close the wound and give anti-biotics, in simple terms. Who knows, are you going to have to give a bottle of whisky and a hot poker treatment as per the arrow wound in Braveheart? If thats whats needed, maybe!
      Last edited by max velocity; 08-06-2012, 10:32 AM.
      Max Velocity

      Max Velocity Tactical presents Contact! A Tactical Manual for Post Collapse Survival

      Are you Ready?

      Comment


      • #4
        Who knows, are you going to have to give a bottle of whisky and a hot poker treatment as per the arrow wound in Braveheart? If thats whats needed, maybe!
        "Here. I'll hold him."

        Guy passes the poker to the next guy-

        "Here, I'll hold him."

        I love that part of the movie.

        I remember the "release is slowly every 15 minutes" thing also, hadn't remembered that in years. My question always was- "why not?" Most of my medic buds couldn't come with a good answer.

        Survival medicine is going to be different than both the civilian side of things and the military/tacticool side of things. It's going to marry some of both of these as well as aspects of homeopathy and plain jury rigging :)

        VERY MUCH enjoying your book BTW, EXCELLENT job. That book is VERY MUCH NEEDED in the survival movement.
        Boris- "He's famous, has picture on three dollar bill!"

        Rocky- "Wow! I've never even seen a three dollar bill!"

        Boris- "Is it my fault you're poor?"

        Comment

        Working...
        X