Lately I've been participating in a local tactical rifle competition. I've shot the match 3 times now over the last few months. Sundays match also involved pistols. I've had alot of things going through my brain of late and i wanted to share and discuss them.
1. AR-15s. WTH? I don't get it. These things are the dominate rifle in these competitions yet at every match, on every squad I'm on, these things malfunction. I don't get it. I never had the myriad of issues I've seen others experience with this rifle. I can't believe I was some how lucky when I ran these rifles. I've seen pretty much every malfunction to date so far usually on the same day. Double feeds, FTE, FTF and operator error. the only malf I've experienced was a short stroke while moving which was quickly taking care of by racking my bolt. Some of its obvious. If you have a $2k AR with a tone of mag pul stuff on it and are dressed to the nines in tac gear seriously do yourself a favor.....don't stick 25 year old worn out gi mags in the rifle. Your rifle will work alot better. If you have a cheap no name ar-15 build and your mag pouch is your back pocket....don't feed it steel cased ammo. pounding out THE VERY 1st CASE fired in the rifle over at the safety table is not a good indication of reliability.
2. gaming. WTH? yeah I know you want to win. but at what cost? the cost I see is making un sound equipment choices. Some of the guys are like me. They show up and run their duty/shtf/working gear. Some army guys did that a couple of matchs back. they came out decked out in their actual fighting gear. these guys in my opinion "get it". They've been shot at before and are out to have fun but also to keep their skills honed up with live ammo. But alot of these guys are in it for the "game". Alot of the guys show up with a couple of belt mounted mag pouchs and no plate carrier/flc/chest rig. This is how they shoot and train. 2 or 3 mags and no gear on their chest. What are they going to do when the SHTF fan and they seriously need to 1, carry more than 3 mags, 2 need to strap on a pack to carry the rest of the gear they now need? they are setup both physically and mentally for a close in short duration gun fight but not to go out and patrol for a few miles or work with or engage a group.
One of the guys shoots a 10 inch SBR. He's real good but....that things fireball in daylight is blinding. at night i can only imagine the night blindness to the shooter and never mind the enemy. everyone within 3 blocks range can see you when you touch that thing off. it would be like having a strobe light attached to your rifle.
3. pistols are pretty reliable...as long as they aren't 1911s. I'm sorry but every time i go to match be it this or uspsa I always see 1911s fail to function well. One of our shooters Sunday had ruger p89 he paid $200 for and it functioned 100%. Another guy had a Springfield 1911 loaded that i know goes for $800 because my friend has the same one. it jammed several times during the course. the 1911 on our squad was the only one that didn't function 100%. we has 2 sigs, 1 HK , my CZ-75, a glock and a ruger. all those guns worked 100%.
4. money does not equal skill and gun fighting training does not equal marksmanship. One of the stages had a texas shooting wheel that we had to engage with our pistol. if you've never shot at one of these its challenging. this was my 1st time shooting at one. However I have alot of experience shooting USPSA steel targets. I cleared the wheel quickly and the 2 other steel targets 7 targets total and i used 12 rounds. not too bad having never shot at one of these things. Watched a guy with an $800 USP run through all his mags before he got all the targets. Watched the guy with the $200 ruger clear the wheel even faster than I. The usp guy has been to training classes. the ruger guy hasn't. Me? USPSA.
5. short brained vs long brained and why both are dangerous mind sets. Over the last 2 years I've attended 3 appleseed shoots and now have been taking close range tactical training and have been as previously stated shooting short range tactical matches. I have encountered 2 opposing and in my opinion danger mindsets. Mindset number 1. long range brain. This is the fred's appleseed crowd. They train for distance shooting. their mantra is the rifleman and his quarter mile (500 yards). The problem is they think this is all they need. They think some future war/insurrection/shtf situation is going to involve them shooting solely at distance. they can't see the need to for shorter range tactical training. Mean while there is the short ranged brains. These are the guys at these tactical shoots. they can't see the need to engage a target past 25 yards. One of them one day says how he'd like a scar heavy with a 16 inch barrel. My response was "you loose alot of velocity with .308 shortening the barrel" his response "so its not like I'm going to shoot anyone past 30 yards". I was pretty much left flabbergasted. These two mindsets can't see the need for a skill set that involves being able to drop prone and hit a target 400 yards away and then pop up , do a tac reload, and then pie a corner, shoot left side or right side or transition to pistol. Neither mind set accepts the other as being valid or acceptable. I believe in both skill sets. both are in my opinion necessary skill sets to be worked on and honed. why limit yourself? you aren't going to dictate how a shtf situation occurs you probably won't be able to dictate how a gun fight occurs either.
what do you guys think? whats your experience? discuss.
1. AR-15s. WTH? I don't get it. These things are the dominate rifle in these competitions yet at every match, on every squad I'm on, these things malfunction. I don't get it. I never had the myriad of issues I've seen others experience with this rifle. I can't believe I was some how lucky when I ran these rifles. I've seen pretty much every malfunction to date so far usually on the same day. Double feeds, FTE, FTF and operator error. the only malf I've experienced was a short stroke while moving which was quickly taking care of by racking my bolt. Some of its obvious. If you have a $2k AR with a tone of mag pul stuff on it and are dressed to the nines in tac gear seriously do yourself a favor.....don't stick 25 year old worn out gi mags in the rifle. Your rifle will work alot better. If you have a cheap no name ar-15 build and your mag pouch is your back pocket....don't feed it steel cased ammo. pounding out THE VERY 1st CASE fired in the rifle over at the safety table is not a good indication of reliability.
2. gaming. WTH? yeah I know you want to win. but at what cost? the cost I see is making un sound equipment choices. Some of the guys are like me. They show up and run their duty/shtf/working gear. Some army guys did that a couple of matchs back. they came out decked out in their actual fighting gear. these guys in my opinion "get it". They've been shot at before and are out to have fun but also to keep their skills honed up with live ammo. But alot of these guys are in it for the "game". Alot of the guys show up with a couple of belt mounted mag pouchs and no plate carrier/flc/chest rig. This is how they shoot and train. 2 or 3 mags and no gear on their chest. What are they going to do when the SHTF fan and they seriously need to 1, carry more than 3 mags, 2 need to strap on a pack to carry the rest of the gear they now need? they are setup both physically and mentally for a close in short duration gun fight but not to go out and patrol for a few miles or work with or engage a group.
One of the guys shoots a 10 inch SBR. He's real good but....that things fireball in daylight is blinding. at night i can only imagine the night blindness to the shooter and never mind the enemy. everyone within 3 blocks range can see you when you touch that thing off. it would be like having a strobe light attached to your rifle.
3. pistols are pretty reliable...as long as they aren't 1911s. I'm sorry but every time i go to match be it this or uspsa I always see 1911s fail to function well. One of our shooters Sunday had ruger p89 he paid $200 for and it functioned 100%. Another guy had a Springfield 1911 loaded that i know goes for $800 because my friend has the same one. it jammed several times during the course. the 1911 on our squad was the only one that didn't function 100%. we has 2 sigs, 1 HK , my CZ-75, a glock and a ruger. all those guns worked 100%.
4. money does not equal skill and gun fighting training does not equal marksmanship. One of the stages had a texas shooting wheel that we had to engage with our pistol. if you've never shot at one of these its challenging. this was my 1st time shooting at one. However I have alot of experience shooting USPSA steel targets. I cleared the wheel quickly and the 2 other steel targets 7 targets total and i used 12 rounds. not too bad having never shot at one of these things. Watched a guy with an $800 USP run through all his mags before he got all the targets. Watched the guy with the $200 ruger clear the wheel even faster than I. The usp guy has been to training classes. the ruger guy hasn't. Me? USPSA.
5. short brained vs long brained and why both are dangerous mind sets. Over the last 2 years I've attended 3 appleseed shoots and now have been taking close range tactical training and have been as previously stated shooting short range tactical matches. I have encountered 2 opposing and in my opinion danger mindsets. Mindset number 1. long range brain. This is the fred's appleseed crowd. They train for distance shooting. their mantra is the rifleman and his quarter mile (500 yards). The problem is they think this is all they need. They think some future war/insurrection/shtf situation is going to involve them shooting solely at distance. they can't see the need to for shorter range tactical training. Mean while there is the short ranged brains. These are the guys at these tactical shoots. they can't see the need to engage a target past 25 yards. One of them one day says how he'd like a scar heavy with a 16 inch barrel. My response was "you loose alot of velocity with .308 shortening the barrel" his response "so its not like I'm going to shoot anyone past 30 yards". I was pretty much left flabbergasted. These two mindsets can't see the need for a skill set that involves being able to drop prone and hit a target 400 yards away and then pop up , do a tac reload, and then pie a corner, shoot left side or right side or transition to pistol. Neither mind set accepts the other as being valid or acceptable. I believe in both skill sets. both are in my opinion necessary skill sets to be worked on and honed. why limit yourself? you aren't going to dictate how a shtf situation occurs you probably won't be able to dictate how a gun fight occurs either.
what do you guys think? whats your experience? discuss.
Comment