I know I'm just being a noodge here, but apocalpyse is just Greek for "revelation", i.e. the revealing of a hidden truth. It has no meaning of catastrophe, disaster, or war, per se (many writings from around the Gospel-writing period were called "apocalyspes", not all of which were concerned specifically with end-times).
Isn't the TEOWAKI scenario more closely alluded to with a term like Armageddon (an end-times battle that is the ultimate TEOWAKI event)?
I know I am being pendandtic here, but I'm really just trying to have a conversation. Perhaps some readers believe that the potential TEOWAKI event in our near future is indeed part of the specific end times described in Revelation; however, many others, inclusing devout believers, can imagine TEOWAKI scenarios that are not in themselves the events foretold in Revelation.
I think, for example, the Romano-British inhabitants of Britannia around A.D. 500 believed that their TEOWAKI (for it certainly was that) of Germanic invasions was the start of bibilical end times, but we can see today that it wasn't.
How many of us believe that the next TEOWAKI must needs be Biblical end times? If not many, then why do we use the term "apocalyptic"?
Comments, flames, twists or corrections, anyone, in the spirit of conversation?
Isn't the TEOWAKI scenario more closely alluded to with a term like Armageddon (an end-times battle that is the ultimate TEOWAKI event)?
I know I am being pendandtic here, but I'm really just trying to have a conversation. Perhaps some readers believe that the potential TEOWAKI event in our near future is indeed part of the specific end times described in Revelation; however, many others, inclusing devout believers, can imagine TEOWAKI scenarios that are not in themselves the events foretold in Revelation.
I think, for example, the Romano-British inhabitants of Britannia around A.D. 500 believed that their TEOWAKI (for it certainly was that) of Germanic invasions was the start of bibilical end times, but we can see today that it wasn't.
How many of us believe that the next TEOWAKI must needs be Biblical end times? If not many, then why do we use the term "apocalyptic"?
Comments, flames, twists or corrections, anyone, in the spirit of conversation?
Comment