Tweet
Didn't we already bail them out?
Seems to me, we already bailed these idiots out once, and now they are asking for ANOTHER $1.8 BILLION. When will it end? Why cannot the sheeple see that they (and you and I) have to pay for this crap! I cannot believe how many sheeple actually believe that we can just "print our way out of it." They think that there is no consequence to just printing money. I then explain it and some get it and some don't. What are they teaching, or should I say "not teaching" in school nowdays? Another reason to continue with home schooling.
http://www.reuters.com/article/GCA-H...67826A20100809
Mortgage finance giant Freddie Mac (FMCC.OB) on Monday said it would need another $1.8 billion in aid from taxpayers, bringing its total request since it was taken over by the government two years ago to more than $64 billion.
The second largest U.S. residential mortgage funds provider reported a loss of $6.0 billion, or $1.85 per diluted share, in the second quarter, including a $1.3 billion dividend payment to the government.
That compares with an $8.0 billion loss in the prior quarter and is the best three-month performance in a year. The firm lost $840 million in the second quarter of last year.
The company said losses stemmed primarily from loans purchased or guaranteed between 2005 and 2008.
The U.S. Treasury took control of Freddie Mac and its sister entity, Fannie Mae (FNMA.OB), at the height of the financial crisis in 2008 as loan losses mounted.
Since the government takeover, the two firms together have requested close to $150 billion from the government's unlimited credit line, scheduled to expire at the end of 2012.
The plan to put Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae into conservatorship was meant to be temporary.
But nearly two years later, Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner has only just begun the process of figuring out how to overhaul the U.S. housing finance system. (I don't think he has figured anything out and is just holding on and hopes for the best.)
Geithner has called for a conference on the future of housing finance to be held at the Treasury later this month.
The financial regulatory overhaul, which was signed into law by President Barack Obama last month, did not address reorganizing Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae, though it did restrict some mortgage lending practices that led to risky loans.
Freddie Mac said loans made last year and the first half of this year have significantly lower default rates than comparable loans made from 2006 through 2008. The company said about a third of its portfolio of single-family home loans consisted of those newer, higher quality loans.
Fannie Mae has also said stricter lending standards adopted last year are beginning to pay off and the firm's "new book" of business is the strongest in a decade.
Congress has scheduled hearings on the U.S. housing finance system in the coming months and any new system could take years to implement.
Despite the improved loan quality, "there is no going back to the Fannie-Freddie model (where shareholders profit in good times and taxpayers pay in bad times) and it does not matter how well their current book of business performs," said Howard Glaser, a consultant to mortgage lenders and a former housing official in the Clinton administration.
http://www.reuters.com/article/GCA-H...67826A20100809
Mortgage finance giant Freddie Mac (FMCC.OB) on Monday said it would need another $1.8 billion in aid from taxpayers, bringing its total request since it was taken over by the government two years ago to more than $64 billion.
The second largest U.S. residential mortgage funds provider reported a loss of $6.0 billion, or $1.85 per diluted share, in the second quarter, including a $1.3 billion dividend payment to the government.
That compares with an $8.0 billion loss in the prior quarter and is the best three-month performance in a year. The firm lost $840 million in the second quarter of last year.
The company said losses stemmed primarily from loans purchased or guaranteed between 2005 and 2008.
The U.S. Treasury took control of Freddie Mac and its sister entity, Fannie Mae (FNMA.OB), at the height of the financial crisis in 2008 as loan losses mounted.
Since the government takeover, the two firms together have requested close to $150 billion from the government's unlimited credit line, scheduled to expire at the end of 2012.
The plan to put Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae into conservatorship was meant to be temporary.
But nearly two years later, Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner has only just begun the process of figuring out how to overhaul the U.S. housing finance system. (I don't think he has figured anything out and is just holding on and hopes for the best.)
Geithner has called for a conference on the future of housing finance to be held at the Treasury later this month.
The financial regulatory overhaul, which was signed into law by President Barack Obama last month, did not address reorganizing Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae, though it did restrict some mortgage lending practices that led to risky loans.
Freddie Mac said loans made last year and the first half of this year have significantly lower default rates than comparable loans made from 2006 through 2008. The company said about a third of its portfolio of single-family home loans consisted of those newer, higher quality loans.
Fannie Mae has also said stricter lending standards adopted last year are beginning to pay off and the firm's "new book" of business is the strongest in a decade.
Congress has scheduled hearings on the U.S. housing finance system in the coming months and any new system could take years to implement.
Despite the improved loan quality, "there is no going back to the Fannie-Freddie model (where shareholders profit in good times and taxpayers pay in bad times) and it does not matter how well their current book of business performs," said Howard Glaser, a consultant to mortgage lenders and a former housing official in the Clinton administration.
Comment