Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Al-Qaida on brink of Nuke Bomb

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Al-Qaida on brink of Nuke Bomb

    Just saw this on Drudge. WikiLeaks reporting that Al-Qaida on brink of Nuke.

    Here is article...

    http://www.vancouversun.com/news/Qai...104/story.html


    Al-Qaida is on the verge of producing radioactive weapons after sourcing nuclear material and recruiting rogue scientists to build "dirty" bombs, according to leaked diplomatic documents.


    A leading atomic regulator has privately warned that the world stands on the brink of a "nuclear 9/11".


    Security briefings suggest that jihadi groups are also close to producing "workable and efficient" biological and chemical weapons that could kill thousands if unleashed in attacks on the West.


    Thousands of classified American cables obtained by the WikiLeaks website and passed to The Daily Telegraph detail the international struggle to stop the spread of weapons-grade nuclear, chemical and biological material around the globe.


    At a Nato meeting in January 2009, security chiefs briefed member states that al-Qaida was plotting a program of "dirty radioactive IEDs", makeshift nuclear roadside bombs that could be used against British troops in Afghanistan.


    As well as causing a large explosion, a "dirty bomb" attack would contaminate the area for many years.


    The briefings also state that al-Qaida documents found in Afghanistan in 2007 revealed that "greater advances" had been made in bioterrorism than was previously realized. An Indian national security adviser told American security personnel in June 2008 that terrorists had made a "manifest attempt to get fissile material" and "have the technical competence to manufacture an explosive device beyond a mere dirty bomb".


    Alerts about the smuggling of nuclear material, sent to Washington from foreign U.S. embassies, document how criminal and terrorist gangs were trafficking large amounts of highly radioactive material across Europe, Africa and the Middle East.


    The alerts explain how customs guards at remote border crossings used radiation alarms to identify and seize cargoes of uranium and plutonium.


    Freight trains were found to be carrying weapons-grade nuclear material across the Kazakhstan-Russia border, highly enriched uranium was transported across Uganda by bus, and a "small time hustler" in Lisbon offered to sell radioactive plates stolen from Chernobyl.


    In one incident in September 2009, two employees at the Rossing Uranium Mine in Namibia smuggled almost half a ton of uranium concentrate powder - yellowcake - out of the compound in plastic bags.


    "Acute safety and security concerns" were even raised in 2008 about the uranium and plutonium laboratory of International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), the nuclear safety watchdog.


    Tomihiro Taniguchi, the deputy director general of the IAEA, has privately warned America that the world faces the threat of a "nuclear 9/11" if stores of uranium and plutonium were not secured against terrorists.


    But diplomats visiting the IAEA's Austrian headquarters in April 2008 said that there was "no way to provide perimeter security" to its own laboratory because it has windows that leave it vulnerable to break-ins.


    Senior British defence officials have raised "deep concerns" that a rogue scientist in the Pakistani nuclear program "could gradually smuggle enough material out to make a weapon", according to a document detailing official talks in London in February 2009.


    Agricultural stores of deadly biological pathogens in Pakistan are also vulnerable to "extremists" who could use supplies of anthrax, foot and mouth disease and avian flu to develop lethal biological weapons.


    Anthrax and other biological agents including smallpox, and avian flu could be sprayed from a shop-bought aerosol can in a crowded area, leaked security briefings warn.


    The security of the world's only two declared smallpox stores in Atlanta, America, and Novosibirsk, Russia, has repeatedly been called into doubt by "a growing chorus of voices" at meetings of the World Health Assembly documented in the leaked cables.


    The alarming disclosures come after Barack Obama, the U.S. president, last year declared nuclear terrorism "the single biggest threat" to international security with the potential to cause "extraordinary loss of life".

    Protecting the sheep from the wolves that want them, their family, their money and full control of our Country!

    Guns and gear are cool, but bandages stop the bleeding!

    ATTENTION: No trees or animals were harmed in any way in the sending of this message, but a large number of electrons were really ticked off!

    NO 10-289!

  • #2
    Awesome just great. Well if suddenly i cant e-mail you all one day cause of an event, well it's been good and I'm better for having extended myself and done this forum with ya. God Bless you all
    Knowledge is Power, Practiced Knowledge is Strength, Tested Knowledge is Confidence

    Comment


    • #3
      Matt if I had to do an approximate strategic target, I would say either Los Angeles or New York again. Both would give them more bang for their buck. Ironically, both are cities full of liberals who bend over backwards to HELP defend and free terrorists that are already captured. Irony at its best...

      If they do hit LA, we have to worry about some fall out from wind drift (via jet stream). But I think the scale of any dirty bomb will be insufficient to effect much of any area outside the immediate target...

      Just my two copper pieces...

      Comment


      • #4
        I have to say, sometimes it's good being in the middle of nowhere..... :)

        Comment


        • #5
          Originally posted by RyanMac View Post
          I have to say, sometimes it's good being in the middle of nowhere..... :)
          I thought the same thing until 9/11. In the after math a report came out of likely targets and Cushing Oklahoma was in the top 15.
          Why Cushing you ask?

          OKLAHOMA CITY, OK, NOV. 29, 2007 - In the September HSToday I wrote the one-page story,
          A desire changes nothing, a decision changes some thing's, but determination changes everything.

          Comment


          • #6
            yep and hey it's not like we ever had a terrorist attack her..... oh wait
            Knowledge is Power, Practiced Knowledge is Strength, Tested Knowledge is Confidence

            Comment


            • #7
              My thoughts on reading that was that if it wasn't a target before, it damned sure is now. Why not paint a freaking bullseye on the place?

              Comment


              • #8
                I work in the oil industry. It is pretty scary to see how easily a facility could be targeted, and the aftermath and destruction could be on a scale that is unimaginable. But, hopefully we have Delta Force, SEALS, or some similar type outfits watching out for them to a degree we only dream about, but just don't know about. Maybe those guys are really, really prepared for this threat, and we won't know until we have a failed terrorist attempt with some dead terrorists. The alternative is pretty frightening. At least I can hope.

                Comment


                • #9
                  Unfortunately I think that most politicians and oil companies don't care , it would cost more to secure all the facilities and keep them safe . If they got attacked and damaged , they have insurance that will pay to replace/fix it . They also have insurance to cover the loss of income while it was down . It would also drive the cost of oil out the roof , so in the long run , they would all profit . The politicians don't care because it wont affect them and then they can all point fingers at each other . One side goes "see we were right , we need to spend more money on defense's" , the other side goes "see if we had given them everything asked for they wouldn't have done this
                  " . So it becomes win/win for all the above , the only person who lose's is the general public . I don't think Washington would be a target at all , most terrorist's know that their best allies come from there . When you fight with your hands tied , you will lose , when you try to make everyone happy , no one is .

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Don't believe in the boogyman hence I'm not worried.

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Sooner or later some terrorist or nut like Ahmadimmihead' is going to use a nuke or large scale bio weapon of some form and the global chaos that will follow will make 9/11 look like a broken window. Been saying it for years and will continue to say it. Not if but when.

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        I've always wondered what the big deal was with this. Let's face it, the technology is almost 70 years old. They have sent students to our best colleges for 30 or more years.

                        A buddy explained to me that yes this is true. All they lack is the components and the nuclear powers years ago realized that they had to keep a strangle hold on the components, etc.
                        www.homesteadingandsurvival.com

                        www.survivalreportpodcast.com

                        "Don't be too proud of this technological terror you've constructed..."

                        Comment

                        Working...
                        X